Cities push to destroy seized guns — even in states where it’s prohibited

Is the argument being made that an “illegally owned” object should be destroyed by the state once discovered?

If so, what other inanimate illegally owned objects does the state already destroy and what illegally owned objects does it sell?

Is there some kind of magic that comes from the destruction of illegally owned objects that helps to “prevent more violence”?

Do poor people not have the same right to self-defense as the rich?

Some cities around the country would like to destroy them (illigally owned firearms) but can’t, because more than a dozen states have passed laws forcing city governments to put the guns up for auction.


Spread the word. Share this post!